| Fruit of the Loom Women's Hi-Cut 3-Pack Briefs |
| Brand: Fruit of the Loom
Category: Apparel
Department: Womens
Buy New: $5.99 - $9.60 (On sale from $12.00)
Avg. Customer Rating:  1 reviews
Sales Rank: 61662
Fabric Type: Cotton
Size: plus-size
Model: D22530
ASIN: B000VCHNP2
Promotion: Get free shipping on this item when you spend $100.00 or more on Qualifying Items offered by Marcus Uniforms. Terms and Conditions
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
|
|
Features:
| • | 100% Cotton | | • | Cotton covered leg bands for comfort and a stylish waistband | | • | A label free product with details printed inside garment | | • | Wash warm, tumble dry low | | • | Imported |
|
|
Accessories:
|
|
Similar Items:
|
|
Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
- 100% soft natural cotton
- Wide elastic logo waistband
- Convenient 3-pack
- Double layer crotch
- Heat-transfer label to minimize tag chafe
Fruit of the Loom 3-Pack Hi-Cut White Brief Technical details: - Sides measure approximately 3 inches from top of waistband to leg opening
- 1 inch elastic waistband
- 1/2 inch elastic leg binding
The Fruit of the Loom 3-Pack Hi-Cut White Brief, from the Fruit of the Loom Just for Her underwear collection, is made from 100% ultra-soft cotton in a hi-cut brief for freedom of motion. This Fruit of the Loom brief features a comfortable, wide elastic logo waistband and covered elastic leg openings. Convenient for stocking up, this Fruit of the Loom 3-Pack Classic White Brief comes in a multi-pack so you can buy enough to wear every day. Specs based on size 6
|
|
Customer Reviews:
My Favorite Everyday Panties October 30, 2007
These are my favorite panties for everyday. I buy the 6-pack though and I keep many on hand in my dresser since they're inexpensive. I prefer the hi-cut leg style and they fit very comfortably, feel cool, and stretch and cling smoothly on me. I like the bikini version to when I need a low riding waistband for under my tight low rise skinny jeans. The white is okay, but if I could find these panties in black I'd prefer that.
|
